Skip to content

Conversation

@bearomorphism
Copy link
Collaborator

@bearomorphism bearomorphism commented Feb 2, 2026

  • Fixed incorrectly used samefile
  • Removed unnecessary same file check in _resolve_config_candidates. The tests already covered the cases "same git repo root and cwd" so it should not be broken after merging this PR.
  • Separate "empty configuration" detection and _parse_settings

Why removing is_empty_config?

Hmm, I believe a stateless function is easier to read in this case.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 2, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 97.99%. Comparing base (26e5d80) to head (2924fae).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1842   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.98%   97.99%           
=======================================
  Files          60       60           
  Lines        2686     2699   +13     
=======================================
+ Hits         2632     2645   +13     
  Misses         54       54           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@bearomorphism bearomorphism force-pushed the remove-is-empty-config branch from 40c5b7b to 922bf56 Compare February 2, 2026 17:20
@bearomorphism bearomorphism force-pushed the remove-is-empty-config branch from 922bf56 to ddadf1b Compare February 3, 2026 15:33
…ction, improve multi config resolution algorithm
@bearomorphism bearomorphism force-pushed the remove-is-empty-config branch from ddadf1b to 2924fae Compare February 3, 2026 15:37
@bearomorphism bearomorphism enabled auto-merge (squash) February 3, 2026 15:39
@bearomorphism bearomorphism merged commit 9783d97 into master Feb 3, 2026
20 checks passed
@bearomorphism bearomorphism deleted the remove-is-empty-config branch February 3, 2026 15:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants